One line in Our English Syllabus really caught my attention: "if education is beaten by training, civilization dies. That is a very likely thing to happen." Lewis here is refering to the type of education that creates a love of learning versus a vocational training that simply prepares one for the workforce. By civilization, he means culture, and believes that it is formed through "leisured activities of thought."
I find myself wondering if this sentiment is true today. If, as Lewis goes on to say, to be fully human is to learn and to have the desire to know, then to be fully human is today simply a matter of preference and access to the Internet or public library. This has almost nothing to do with formal or vocational education. And further, going on to higher education does not automatically make one a creator of culture. One can graduate with a BA or BS and still be a drone that simply perpetuates culture and is interested only in learning enough to remain high enough in one's field to make large amounts of money. In fact, I personally know people who fit this example perfectly.
Conversely, love of knowledge can, as it did for me, grow out of a pre-"human" state. I began to love learning as soon as I learned to read. Since kindergarten I've gobbled up as many books as I can, and most of them were outside the lists of books perscribed to me by my teachers; I was, and still am, full of curiosity. In this way, I could be considered "fully human" long before I came to participate in post-secondary education.
On a side note, most people who go to a college or university are not lower class - the lower class often attends vocational schools, and in this respect I find Lewis to be insensitive, even incorrect. Firstly, although vocational schools do not train one to persue certain fields of knowledge or cultivate a healthy curiousity for certain topics the student may be interested in, that does not mean that the students at vocational schools are less curious or less able to think for themselves. It only means they need to pay their bills more desperately than others of us do. And secondly, anyone can learn, and love learning for its own sake, outside of their job.
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like the sentiment in the last paragraph that going to a vocational school does not mean that one cannot get an "education" as Lewis calls it, but I think that Lewis was more referring the rather narrow spectrum of the university and college and not to nay say the idea that education cannot be gleaned from the world around us. One would be silly to assert that because after all did not Plato and Socrates and Siddhartha not learn what they knew from the world the saw around them?
ReplyDeleteI like your point about college grads only perpetuating culture. I think the love of learning is indeed necessary to break outside of culture, to bring new things and experiences to what's already been established; anything short of this is busywork. I also like how you pointed out that vocational students can love learning just as much as college students; that it is only the subject of their study that is different.
ReplyDeleteI too agree with your comments. What I was struggling with today was the fact that some do truly enjoy the learning, but are just not made for the school system. My question is, "what about those who do not enjoy school, cheat their way through, and then make millions?" I know Lewis would rip these people apart, but after that, they are still sitting in their yachts while others are struggling to pay bills. I have no solution, but it just seems to large of a thought to pass by!
ReplyDeleteI like how you clearly bring up people who chase after money rather than meaningful things in life. I too know a lot of people who still think money will make them happy, even when it is clear it won't. I also fear as the economy gets worse, it just makes people want to chase after money all the more.
ReplyDeleteAmen if that doesn't convey my opinion about your blog I don't know if any word would. I especially liked how you used Lewis' definition of a human in a more modern context. I also thought your conclusion was right on the money so to speak. I don’t know what else to say beyond that as you already said it.
ReplyDelete